How to Write a Research
Proposal
Most students and beginning
researchers do not fully understand what a research proposal means, nor do they
understand its importance. To put it bluntly, one's research is only as a good
as one's proposal. An ill-conceived proposal dooms the project even if it
somehow gets through the Thesis Supervisory Committee. A high quality proposal,
on the other hand, not only promises success for the project, but also
impresses your Thesis Committee about your potential as a researcher.
A research proposal is intended
to convince others that you have a worthwhile research project and that you
have the competence and the work-plan to complete it. Generally, a research
proposal should contain all the key elements involved in the research process
and include sufficient information for the readers to evaluate the proposed
study.
Regardless of your research area
and the methodology you choose, all research proposals must address the
following questions: What you plan to accomplish, why you want to do it and how
you are going to do it.
The proposal should have
sufficient information to convince your readers that you have an important
research idea, that you have a good grasp of the relevant literature and the
major issues, and that your methodology is sound.
The quality of your research
proposal depends not only on the quality of your proposed project, but also on
the quality of your proposal writing. A good research project may run the risk
of rejection simply because the proposal is poorly written. Therefore, it pays
if your writing is coherent, clear and compelling.
This paper focuses on proposal
writing rather than on the development of research ideas.
Title:
It should be concise and
descriptive. For example, the phrase, "An investigation of . . ."
could be omitted. Often titles are stated in terms of a functional
relationship, because such titles clearly indicate the independent and
dependent variables. However, if possible, think of an informative but catchy
title. An effective title not only pricks the reader's interest, but also
predisposes him/her favourably towards the proposal.
Abstract:
It is a brief summary of
approximately 300 words. It should include the research question, the rationale
for the study, the hypothesis (if any), the method and the main findings.
Descriptions of the method may include the design, procedures, the sample and
any instruments that will be used.
Introduction:
The main purpose of the
introduction is to provide the necessary background or context for your
research problem. How to frame the research problem is perhaps the biggest
problem in proposal writing.
If the research problem is framed
in the context of a general, rambling literature review, then the research
question may appear trivial and uninteresting. However, if the same question is
placed in the context of a very focused and current research area, its
significance will become evident.
Unfortunately, there are no hard
and fast rules on how to frame your research question just as there is no
prescription on how to write an interesting and informative opening paragraph.
A lot depends on your creativity, your ability to think clearly and the depth
of your understanding of problem areas.
However, try to place your
research question in the context of either a current "hot" area, or
an older area that remains viable. Secondly, you need to provide a brief but
appropriate historical backdrop. Thirdly, provide the contemporary context in
which your proposed research question occupies the central stage. Finally,
identify "key players" and refer to the most relevant and
representative publications. In short, try to paint your research question in
broad brushes and at the same time bring out its significance.
The introduction typically begins
with a general statement of the problem area, with a focus on a specific
research problem, to be followed by the rational or justification for the
proposed study. The introduction generally covers the following elements:
State the research problem, which
is often referred to as the purpose of the study.
Provide the context and set the
stage for your research question in such a way as to show its necessity and
importance.
Present the rationale of your
proposed study and clearly indicate why it is worth doing.
Briefly describe the major issues
and sub-problems to be addressed by your research.
Identify the key independent and
dependent variables of your experiment. Alternatively, specify the phenomenon
you want to study.
State your hypothesis or theory,
if any. For exploratory or phenomenological research, you may not have any
hypotheses. (Please do not confuse the hypothesis with the statistical null
hypothesis.)
Set the delimitation or
boundaries of your proposed research in order to provide a clear focus.
Provide definitions of key
concepts. (This is optional.)
Literature Review:
Sometimes the literature review
is incorporated into the introduction section. However, most professors prefer
a separate section, which allows a more thorough review of the literature.
The literature review serves
several important functions:
Ensures that you are not
"reinventing the wheel".
Gives credits to those who have
laid the groundwork for your research.
Demonstrates your knowledge of
the research problem.
Demonstrates your understanding
of the theoretical and research issues related to your research question.
Shows your ability to critically
evaluate relevant literature information.
Indicates your ability to
integrate and synthesize the existing literature.
Provides new theoretical insights
or develops a new model as the conceptual framework for your research.
Convinces your reader that your
proposed research will make a significant and substantial contribution to the
literature (i.e., resolving an important theoretical issue or filling a major
gap in the literature).
Most students' literature reviews suffer from the following problems:
Lacking organization and
structure
Lacking focus, unity and
coherence
Being repetitive and verbose
Failing to cite influential
papers
Failing to keep up with recent
developments
Failing to critically evaluate
cited papers
Citing irrelevant or trivial
references
Depending too much on secondary
sources
Your scholarship and research
competence will be questioned if any of the above applies to your proposal
There are different ways to
organize your literature review. Make use of subheadings to bring order and
coherence to your review. For example, having established the importance of
your research area and its current state of development, you may devote several
subsections on related issues as: theoretical models, measuring instruments,
cross-cultural and gender differences, etc.
It is also helpful to keep in
mind that you are telling a story to an audience. Try to tell it in a
stimulating and engaging manner. Do not bore them, because it may lead to
rejection of your worthy proposal. (Remember: Professors and scientists are
human beings too.)
Methods:
The Method section is very
important because it tells your Research Committee how you plan to tackle your
research problem. It will provide your work plan and describe the activities
necessary for the completion of your project.
The guiding principle for writing
the Method section is that it should contain sufficient information for the
reader to determine whether methodology is sound. Some even argue that a good
proposal should contain sufficient details for another qualified researcher to
implement the study.
You need to demonstrate your
knowledge of alternative methods and make the case that your approach is the
most appropriate and most valid way to address your research question.
Please note that your research
question may be best answered by qualitative research. However, since most
mainstream psychologists are still biased against qualitative research,
especially the phenomenological variety, you may need to justify your
qualitative method.
Furthermore, since there are no
well-established and widely accepted canons in qualitative analysis, your method
section needs to be more elaborate than what is required for traditional
quantitative research. More importantly, the data collection process in
qualitative research has a far greater impact on the results as compared to
quantitative research. That is another reason for greater care in describing
how you will collect and analyze your data. (How to write the Method section
for qualitative research is a topic for another paper.)
For quantitative studies, the
method section typically consists of the following sections:
Design -Is it a questionnaire
study or a laboratory experiment? What kind of design do you choose?
Subjects or participants - Who
will take part in your study ? What kind of sampling procedure do you use?
Instruments - What kind of measuring instruments or questionnaires
do you use? Why do you choose them? Are they valid and reliable?
Procedure - How do you plan to carry out your study? What
activities are involved? How long does it take?
Results:
Obviously you do not have results
at the proposal stage. However, you need to have some idea about what kind of
data you will be collecting, and what statistical procedures will be used in
order to answer your research question or test you hypothesis.
Discussion:
It is important to convince your
reader of the potential impact of your proposed research. You need to
communicate a sense of enthusiasm and confidence without exaggerating the
merits of your proposal. That is why you also need to mention the limitations
and weaknesses of the proposed research, which may be justified by time and
financial constraints as well as by the early developmental stage of your
research area.
Common Mistakes in Proposal Writing
Failure to provide the proper
context to frame the research question.
Failure to delimit the boundary
conditions for your research.
Failure to cite landmark studies.
Failure to accurately present the
theoretical and empirical contributions by other researchers.
Failure to stay focused on the
research question.
Failure to develop a coherent and
persuasive argument for the proposed research.
Too much detail on minor issues,
but not enough detail on major issues.
Too much rambling -- going
"all over the map" without a clear sense of direction. (The best
proposals move forward with ease and grace like a seamless river.)
Too many citation lapses and
incorrect references.
Too long or too short.
Failing to follow the APA style.
Slopping writing.